HArmonyCa กับ Profhilo ต่างกันอย่างไร?

HArmonyCa vs Profhilo: what is the difference? HArmonyCa is a hybrid filler combining cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) with CaHA, injected deeply for volume and tissue support, while Profhilo is non-cross-linked HA injected into the skin to improve skin quality and is not designed to add volume. This article explains it for first-timers, with a table comparing HArmonyCa, Profhilo and Sculptra, the Profhilo Structura version that is still under study, the evidence on speed and duration, risks, and how to choose a clinic. It is general knowledge, not a diagnosis.

Key Takeaways

  • HArmonyCa is a hybrid of 20 mg/mL HA with 55.7% CaHA particles, injected in the deep dermis and subdermal layers. Profhilo combines high- and low-molecular-weight HA injected as small points in the dermis. They do different jobs and are not direct substitutes.[2][3][5][9]
  • No study compares HArmonyCa with Profhilo directly, so claims that HArmonyCa lasts longer or Profhilo works faster cannot be confirmed. The numbers for each come from studies designed differently.[5][10]
  • In the 2025 study the share improved after HArmonyCa fell from 82.8% at month 1 to 65.9% at month 12, and injection-site lumps occurred in 10.7%. For Profhilo, a 12-person split-face trial found skin thickness no better than saline. Expectations should be set carefully for both.[5][12]
  • Profhilo Structura is another IBSA version for which only a trial registration that is still recruiting was found, with no published results, and the clinic's Profhilo page does not mention it, so ask the clinic whether it is offered.[3][14]

The table below compares HArmonyCa, Profhilo and Sculptra on what first-timers usually ask: which concern each suits, how it is injected, what the evidence says and what to watch for. Data come from the clinic's service pages and the studies that could be checked. The figures come from studies designed differently, so they cannot be compared directly across columns, and the table is not a ranking.

sectionHArmonyCaProfhiloSculptra
Main goal per the clinic's service pageVolume, tissue support and facial contour in people whose mid-face is losing volume[2]Skin quality such as mild laxity, elasticity and hydration; not adding volume or lifting facial structure[3]Gradually prompting the body to build collagen; does not add volume immediately[4]
Main materialCross-linked HA 20 mg/mL + CaHA particles 55.7%[5]High-molecular-weight HA 32 mg + low-molecular-weight HA 32 mg per 2 mL syringe; the clinic states no cross-linker is used[3][9]PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic Acid)[4]
Layer and technique in studiesMain study of 140 people: deep dermis in 83.6%; a 15-person study used a 23G cannula in retrograde threads, 1.25 mL per side, in front of the ear[5][6]Small points in the dermis; the 64-person study used 5 points per side, 2 sessions 4 weeks apart; the neck study used 2 sessions 30 days apart[9][10]Under the skin, several sessions about 3-4 weeks apart in studies[4][15]
Headline numbers140 people: improved by at least one grade in 82.8% at month 1, peak 84.8% at month 3, 65.9% at month 12[5]Neck, 25 people: laxity improved 15% at 1 month and 21% at 4 months. Face, 64 people: significant improvement from week 4 or 8, still significant at week 16[9][10]Cheek, 149 people: 71.6% improved at month 12 vs 26.1% untreated[16]
Limits of the evidenceNo control group, manufacturer-funded, mostly participants with lighter skin[2][5]Mostly small open-label studies; a 12-person split-face trial against saline found skin thickness no better than saline[9][10][12]5 of 11 trials at high risk of bias; authors concluded quality is low[15]
Side effects reportedInjection-site reactions 95.7% (mostly mild to moderate); injection-site lumps 10.7%[5]Minor, temporary local reactions in 23% of the 64-person study; 12 adverse-event reports from more than 40,000 patients over 3 years[10][11]Bruising, hematoma, tenderness, swelling and lumps under the skin[15]
Cautions per the service pagesNot for injection around the eyes, the lips or between the brows[2]Deep folds or clear volume loss may need a method better matched to the goal[3]Not for people allergic to ingredients, with a history of severe allergy, or prone to raised scars[4]

Thai registration status of all three products was not checked in this article. Ask to see the box, label and Thai FDA registration number of the product actually used before every injection. Service details: HArmonyCa, Profhilo and Sculptra

HArmonyCa vs Profhilo: the short answer for first-timers

In the simplest terms, HArmonyCa works in the deeper layer to support tissue and add some volume, while Profhilo works in the skin layer to improve skin quality; it is like reinforcing the frame underneath versus conditioning the surface above. This is an analogy to help picture it, not a detailed medical explanation. Per the clinic's service pages, HArmonyCa is a hybrid filler and not a lifting device[2] , and Profhilo is not injected to add volume.[3]

The clinic's earlier article compared the two along the same lines[1] . Checking against the research, no study compares the two directly, so every figure here comes from studies of each product separately. If you are not yet sure what a biostimulator is or how it differs from a filler, start with How do biostimulators differ from fillers

Why "which is better" is the wrong question

Because the two answer different problems. Someone whose cheeks are flattening and jawline is blurring has a volume and structure problem; someone with dry, mildly slack skin has a skin-quality problem. The choice should start from your goal and facial anatomy, not from a product name.[2][3]

Ingredients, injection layer, and what is Profhilo Structura

HArmonyCa: HA plus CaHA

HArmonyCa is made by Allergan Aesthetics and contains cross-linked HA 20 mg/mL plus CaHA particles at 55.7% w/w, injected in the deep dermis and subdermal layers according to the studies and the product information the clinic cites[2][5] . The idea is that HA gives volume and support early, while CaHA is the component thought to stimulate collagen. In a 15-person study using ultrasound and elastography, collagen fibers increased from day 60, were confirmed at day 90 and peaked between days 90 and 180; another 15-person study found dermal thickness increased at 90 and 120 days. Both were small studies.[6][7]

Profhilo: high- and low-molecular-weight HA combined

Profhilo, from IBSA, combines high- and low-molecular-weight HA as complexes, injected as small points in the dermis. A review of postmarketing data describes it as made by a heat process without chemical cross-linkers and with low viscosity[11] . The clinic's service page says the collagen claim comes from cell experiments and has not been shown directly in human skin[3] . As for regulatory status, per a company press release from July 2026 the product still needs U.S. approval before sale there, and its Thai status was not checked.[18]

HArmonyCa vs Profhilo Structura: how do they differ?

Profhilo Structura is another IBSA version. In the sources checked, the only information found is trial registration NCT06719154, sponsored by IBSA. Its title says it evaluates the safety and efficacy of Structura for face adipose tissue restoration, its status is recruiting, estimated enrollment is 164, and it describes a product with high- and low-molecular-weight HA that has not been chemically modified[14] . No published results were found, so Structura cannot be compared with HArmonyCa using numbers.

What can be said carefully is that the study title suggests Structura is being developed for facial volume goals, unlike the original Profhilo, which the clinic's page describes as aimed at skin quality[3][14] . The clinic's Profhilo page does not mention Structura, so anyone interested should ask whether it is offered and request the product registration details before deciding.

Does one work faster or last longer? What the evidence shows

HArmonyCa: peak around months 3-6, then a decline

In the 140-person open-label post-marketing study without a control group, the share rated improved by at least one grade was 82.8% at month 1, 84.8% at month 3, 82.7% at month 6, 74.8% at month 9 and 65.9% at month 12. The authors concluded results last about a year, but the figures were not constant and most participants had lighter skin[5] . The study was manufacturer-funded.[2]

Profhilo: mild to moderate skin-quality change, results vary by study

The 64-person study was a single-site open-label study with 2 sessions 4 weeks apart; improvements were significant from week 4 or 8 and still significant at week 16[10] . The neck study of 25 people found laxity improved 15% at 1 month and 21% at 4 months, with no control group and IBSA as funder[9] . In contrast, a randomized split-face trial of 12 people around the mouth, against saline, found 3D images showed improved wrinkles and pores, but skin thickness was no greater than the saline side, and some respondents were dissatisfied[12] . A systematic review of 9 studies and 278 people, mostly by authors linked to the manufacturer, concluded several measures improved or tended to improve.[13]

Common claims versus the evidence

  • HArmonyCa lasts longer than Profhilo: no direct comparison was found. The HArmonyCa study followed people for 12 months, while the Profhilo studies checked followed people for less time (4 months in the neck study and 16 weeks in the face study). A shorter follow-up does not mean results fade sooner.[5][9][10]
  • Profhilo works faster than HArmonyCa: the 64-person study found significant differences from week 4-8, and HArmonyCa had 82.8% responders at month 1, but the measures and raters differ, so they cannot be compared directly.[5][10]
  • Profhilo vs Sculptra: Sculptra is PLLA injected under the skin in several sessions and belongs to the biostimulator group, while Profhilo is HA injected in the skin layer. Sculptra's 149-person cheek trial against no treatment showed results at month 12, but some authors were affiliated with the manufacturer.[4][15][16]

Risks, side effects and cautions for HArmonyCa and Profhilo

HArmonyCa: the 2025 open-label study found injection-site reactions in 95.7%, mostly mild to moderate. The most common treatment-related effects were injection-site pain 11.4%, lumps 10.7% and headache 7.1%. No serious treatment-related adverse events were found, but 8 mild events (mostly lumps) were still present in 6 participants at the end of the study[5] . An advisory-board meeting of 13 European physicians concluded that managing complications of HA-CaHA is similar to managing those of single-agent fillers, and stressed knowledge of anatomy, aseptic technique and correct injection technique.[8]

Profhilo: the 64-person study reported minor, temporary local reactions in 23%[10] . Postmarketing data covering more than 40,000 patients over 3 years logged 12 adverse-event reports, none classed as serious, but these are reports sent to IBSA's safety database, and the authors say they cannot rule out under-reporting of minor events.[11]

A risk common to all injectables is vascular occlusion, which a review of filler complications describes as a serious condition that must be recognized and managed promptly[17] . If you have unusually severe pain, rapidly pale or discolored skin, abnormal mottling, or any change in vision after injection, contact a doctor immediately. People who are pregnant, breastfeeding, on anticoagulants or prone to raised scars should tell the doctor before every treatment.[3][4]

Choosing the one that matches your goal

  • Flattening cheeks, blurred jawline, loss of mid-face volume: HArmonyCa is the option studied in this group, but accept the limits of manufacturer-funded evidence, and it is not suited to the eye area or lips.[2][5]
  • Dry, mildly to moderately slack skin, wanting better skin quality without changing face shape: Profhilo matches the goal per its service page, but expect modest results that vary between people.[3][12]
  • Wanting gradual results and accepting that correction is harder than with HA filler: Sculptra is another option in the biostimulator group, with randomized trials of low overall quality.[15][16]
  • Deep folds or spot-specific reshaping: another HA filler may fit better; see. Fresh Code Clinic fillers
  • Wanting to combine the two: no study of HArmonyCa together with Profhilo was found in the sources checked, so the doctor should assess individually and set the sequence and interval.

Before deciding, ask to see the box and label of the actual product, ask how many sessions and how much product the doctor plans, and ask what the plan is if a lump forms or you are unhappy. More on collagen-stimulating options is in How do biostimulators differ from fillers

Choosing a clinic for Profhilo and HArmonyCa: private and hassle-free

Looking for a clinic for Profhilo with a private, hassle-free service: what to ask

There is no standard measure of privacy or hassle-free service, so ask clearly before booking: is the consultation room private, are several clients treated in the same room, can you book ahead, roughly how long is the wait and the time with the doctor, who will actually inject, and what follow-up is arranged.

What can be checked on Fresh Code Clinic's website is that you can book and ask via LINE @freshcodeclinic, it is open daily 11:00 - 20:00 at 19 Sukhumvit Soi 5 near BTS Nana Exit 1 with parking, and per the doctor's profile the doctor assesses and explains the suitable approach for each person before every treatment[19] . The website does not state that the service is private or how many clients are seen per time slot, so ask the clinic directly before booking.

Doctors who handle these products at the clinic: per their profiles

According to the profile the clinic provides, Dr. Plan (Dr. Chinathip Theerawattanawit, license ว.59916) handles the collagen stimulators Sculptra, Radiesse, Juvelook, HArmonyCa and Profhilo, and completed a clinical fellowship in Procedural Dermatology and Laser at Ramathibodi Hospital[19] . Dr. Krit (Dr. Gritimook Wisettanakorn, license ว.49767) handles fillers, botulinum toxin and non-surgical lifting; per his profile he is faculty of the Allergan Medical Institute, the maker of HArmonyCa, so ask about alternatives as well[20] . This comes from profiles provided by the doctors and the clinic; license numbers can be verified with the Medical Council of Thailand[21] . See all doctors on the Fresh Code Clinic doctors page

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Q: What is the difference between HArmonyCa and Profhilo for someone who has never had injections ?

HArmonyCa is a hybrid filler (HA plus CaHA) injected deeply for volume and tissue support. Profhilo is HA injected into the skin layer to improve skin quality and is not designed to add volume. They answer different problems, so choose by goal and have a doctor assess your face.[2][3]

Q: How does HArmonyCa compare with Profhilo Structura ?

Profhilo Structura is an IBSA version for which only a trial registration that is still recruiting was found, on face adipose tissue restoration, with no published results. It cannot be compared with HArmonyCa using numbers. Ask the clinic whether it offers this version.[14]

Q: Which works faster, and which lasts longer ?

No direct comparison was found. HArmonyCa was rated improved in 82.8% at month 1 and 65.9% at month 12; Profhilo showed significant improvement from week 4-8 in a 64-person study, but with different measures and shorter follow-up, so neither can be called faster or longer-lasting.[5][10]

Q: Can HArmonyCa and Profhilo be done together ?

No study of the two together was found in the sources checked, so no confirmed sequence or interval exists. A doctor should assess individually whether your goals need both volume and skin quality.[2][3]

Q: I'm afraid of choosing the wrong one. How do I avoid booking the wrong service ?

Start by telling the doctor what worries you (flat cheeks, jawline, dry skin or mild laxity), then ask why this product is proposed, what the alternatives are, how many sessions, and how an unwanted result would be corrected. A consultation does not obligate you to be injected.[2][3]

Q: What should I look for in a private, hassle-free clinic for Profhilo ?

Ask the clinic directly whether the room is private, whether you can book ahead, how long the wait and consultation are, and who will inject. Fresh Code Clinic accepts bookings via LINE, but its website does not state that the service is private, so ask before booking.[19][21]

Conclusion

HArmonyCa and Profhilo differ in goal and injection layer. HArmonyCa is a hybrid HA-plus-CaHA filler injected deeply for volume and tissue support, while Profhilo is HA injected in the skin layer to improve skin quality. No study compares them directly. HArmonyCa's rated improvement fell from 82.8% to 65.9% over 12 months in a study without a control group, Profhilo has a small split-face trial where skin thickness was no better than saline, and the Structura version is still under study.[5][12][14]

Anyone looking for a Profhilo or HArmonyCa clinic that feels private and hassle-free should ask about the consultation room, advance booking and who will inject before booking, and verify the doctor's license with the Medical Council of Thailand. Fresh Code Clinic is a Sukhumvit Soi 5 clinic near BTS Nana Exit 1, with parking, open daily 11:00 - 20:00, and its doctors assess your face and goals individually before planning. The information in this article is general knowledge, not a diagnosis or a guarantee of results. For more information, consult a doctor for an assessment first.

Fresh Code Clinic Team

Fresh Code Clinic is a beauty lifestyle clinic located in Sukhumvit Soi 5, near BTS Nana. It offers skin care services, acne treatment, laser treatments, skin tightening, fillers, and Botox, all provided by a team of expert doctors with personalized care tailored to each individual's skin condition.

19 Sukhumvit Soi 5, near BTS Nana, Exit 1. Parking available. Open daily 11:00 AM – 8:00 PM. Tel: 02-253-2236, 083-626-4264

References

  1. HArmonyCa vs Profhilo: what are the differences (the clinic's earlier article) — Fresh Code Clinic
  2. HArmonyCa hybrid filler (service page) — Fresh Code Clinic
  3. Profhilo (service page) — Fresh Code Clinic
  4. Sculptra PLLA collagen stimulator (service page) — Fresh Code Clinic
  5. A Prospective, Open-Label, Post Marketing Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Injectable — Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (Gritti et al., 2025)
  6. Facial rejuvenation with the new hybrid filler HArmonyCa: Clinical and aesthetic outcomes assessed by 2D and 3D photographs, ultrasound, and elastography — Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (Urdiales-Gálvez et al., 2023)
  7. Dermal Thickness Increase and Aesthetic Improvement with Hybrid Product Combining Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite: A Clinical and Sonographic Analysis — Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open (Bravo et al., 2023)
  8. Prevention and Management of Complications With a Hyaluronic Acid-Calcium Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Injectable — Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology (2025)
  9. Efficacy and Tolerability of Hybrid Complexes of High- and Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronan Intradermal Injections for the Treatment of Skin Roughness and Laxity of the Neck — ScientificWorldJournal (Sparavigna et al., 2022)
  10. Efficacy and tolerance of an injectable medical device containing stable hybrid cooperative complexes of high- and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid: a monocentric 16 weeks open-label evaluation — Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology (Sparavigna et al., 2016)
  11. Safety Assessment of High- and Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronans (Profhilo) as Derived from Worldwide Postmarketing Data — BioMed Research International (Cassuto et al., 2020)
  12. Effects of Profhilo Tissue Bioremodeling on Skin Texture and Perioral Wrinkles: A Randomized Controlled Triple-Blind Clinical Trial — Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (Zanella et al., 2026)
  13. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Profhilo and Profhilo Body — Plastic and Aesthetic Nursing (Sparavigna et al., 2026)
  14. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Profhilo Structura (NCT06719154) — ClinicalTrials.gov
  15. Efficacy and Safety of Poly-l-Lactic Acid in Facial Aesthetics: A Systematic Review — Polymers (Signori et al., 2024)
  16. Effectiveness and Safety of Sculptra Poly-l-Lactic Acid Injectable Implant in the Correction of Cheek Wrinkles — Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (Fabi et al., 2024)
  17. Complications of injectable fillers, part 2: vascular complications — Aesthetic Surgery Journal (DeLorenzi)
  18. Evolus Announces Partnership with IBSA to Develop and Commercialize Market Leading Profhilo in the United States — Business Wire, July 8, 2026 (company press release)
  19. Dr. Chinathip Theerawattanawit (Dr. Plan), license ว.59916 — Fresh Code Clinic
  20. Dr. Gritimook Wisettanakorn (Dr. Krit), license ว.49767 — Fresh Code Clinic
  21. Medical Council of Thailand — check a doctor's name and license number